Image Uploader Disintegral, September 1, 2018; 06:24 Tags abuse artist:Disintegral cookie crying psychological_abuse pway saddies style_experiment Rating safe Source Unknown Locked No Comments September 1, 2018; 06:25 - Reply Disintegral: Decided to experiment with a more cartoonish fluffy style. I think it turned out okay. September 1, 2018; 06:34 - Reply MostlyHereToLurk: I think I like this fluffy style more than your previous one, mostly just 'cause it looks cuter, and cute aggression is the main draw with fluffy abuse for me. September 1, 2018; 07:13 - Reply Disintegral: @MostlyHereToLurk: Yeah, I wanted to try something cuter, even though I tend to like drawing more lifelike stuff. September 1, 2018; 07:13 - Reply Disintegral: @Disintegral: Since the cuter fluffs are often way more stompable. September 1, 2018; 07:31 - Reply Anonymous1: TBH, I prefer your previous style. It made the Fluffies look like the semi-finished work of a project desperate to make super-cute toys....but, being semi-finished, they fell right down into the Uncanny Valley and are actually offputtingly hideous. September 1, 2018; 07:37 - Reply Anonymous2: Hhhnnggg September 1, 2018; 07:39 - Reply Anonymous3(2): I'd take fluffies home and give them sorry enfies if they were real. September 1, 2018; 07:45 - Reply Disintegral: @Anonymous: Yeah, I think I prefer the other style, for exactly that reason. I never really found them ugly though, just uncanny valley-ish. Cute, even, but more in that baby cow sort of way. I'm not full-on switching styles, FYI. I'm actually thinking I might go back and forth between this and the more lifelike style depending on the pic, since this sort of style's a bit quicker to draw. September 1, 2018; 07:48 - Reply Disintegral: Just looking at the eyes and body shape, I think I had a bit of unconscious wolfram influence going on here. September 1, 2018; 07:57 - Reply HerdKing: I couldn’t say which style is better. I totally agree with going back and forth depending on the context. September 1, 2018; 08:03 - Reply grenadier_katt: I think the appropriate term for this is... oof. September 1, 2018; 08:30 - Reply Hypertripp: This is beautiful new place for psychological abuse to go, your doing gods work Disintegral. September 1, 2018; 09:21 - Reply Fluffwit: How dickish! I love it! September 1, 2018; 10:07 - Reply Anonymous4: Now Kick him really hard to show him just how sad he's made you (and to hear the satisfying crack as his ribs break) "wy huwt babbeh" the phrase that goes anywhere` September 1, 2018; 10:42 - Reply LORD: We really need more psychological abuse, it always fun to mess with gullible idiots September 1, 2018; 14:08 - Reply RevMe: This one kinda reminds me (in the general theme of lying to fluffies to break them) of one of the favorite ones I wrote: >>7433 September 1, 2018; 14:42 - Reply Anonymous5: lol dope. September 1, 2018; 14:42 - Reply Guzziman: I love this, there's a simple joy to fucking with fluffies. September 1, 2018; 14:49 - Reply Soulvei: How time tiww weggies? September 1, 2018; 15:12 - Reply Pinkyfluffy: Poor fluffy. ... ... I want to thank you ; for giving me an idea. September 1, 2018; 15:26 - Reply Fluffy_Fabricator: Great artwork Disintegral, your Fluffies are distinctive but still have the cartoony-realism that makes it perfect. Eyes in particular. September 1, 2018; 16:00 - Reply Anonymous6: i love psychological abuse September 1, 2018; 16:11 - Reply Anonymous7: Classic September 1, 2018; 17:37 - Reply Disintegral: @Anonymous: Honestly, I don't want to see the guy get (physically) hurt. Like @Guzziman said, there's a simple joy in fucking with fluffies, and I think violence would ruin that here. @RevMe: I like that. You'd quite possibly have a full-blown feral war on your hands. Could help with cutting down the local population a bit, and it's not like it'd probably hurt anyone that's not a fluffy in the process. @Soulvei: I dunno, maybe we should get rid of them and wait to find out? @Pinkyfluffy: No problem - but will your new idea top the Wet Fluffy you just posted? September 2, 2018; 06:49 - Reply Waaaghlord: lol, good one indeed toooo easy. That's the stuff that can traumatize a fluffy forever and social cripel it for live ... i wonder if it already doesn't want to play and hug anymore. September 2, 2018; 06:57 - Reply FoxHoarder: I definitely like this style more. It looks so soft and fluffy, I'd just want to pinch those fluffy little cheeks until it slowly realizes I'm not about to let go. :D Cuter is always better. Nice idea too, psychological abuse is always the best, and this really plays on the fluffies simple naivety. Speaking of which, does anyone happen to know a story written from the point of view of a fluffy who gets adopted by a man who offers it everything in exchange for famous fluffy hugs, but pretends to be in terrible pain whenever the fluffy hugs him? September 2, 2018; 07:33 - Reply Disintegral: @Waaaghlord: Well, now it has the idea that hugs and love can actually be harmful. Of course, there's no such thing as a hugs-and-love allergy, but it doesn't need to know that. @FoxHoarder: I'm not surprised that you'd prefer it, knowing your style. Can't say I know that story, but I want to read it, and you may not be the first I've seen mention it. September 4, 2018; 09:26 - Reply Mr_Calzone: YEEEEEAAAAAH!! January 10, 2019; 00:20 - Reply Anonymous8: Dude, not even fluffies are this stupid. February 10, 2019; 04:18 - Reply Disintegral: @Anonymous: I think there's enough evidence on the Booru for a decent counter-argument to that.