abuse artist:ur blood box cleaning_fluffies cleaning_fluffy comic crying explicit factory fluffies_as_cleaning_tools fluffy_foals foal foals impalement mop ms_paint original_art product rag request science shit tears testing thrown_away trash

Image

main image

Comments

- Reply
UR: Who the hell buy this? Sick fucks with money
Why do they buy it? Because fuck fluffies, that's why
Isn't messier this way? Some times, but the screams make worth it

I hope the Doctor like it.
- Reply
Pest_Control: What do you do with them after the expiration date?
- Reply
Eraqus: That must be one twisted world.
- Reply
UR: Trow them in the trash or something. Responsible people will recycle them

- Reply
Mr_Fondale: I wonder if you remove a fluffys head, does the head still live and try to say "Why hurty fwuffy? Wan die."(It cant btw. no lungs.)?

- Reply
lordanubis: At least one of them seems to be enjoying himself.

- Reply
Mr_Tiggly_the_Wiggly_Walnut: Swifter's got some steep competition.

- Reply
Emil: Those foals will arrive covered in shit..

- Reply
-Jack: @Emil: Which defeats the purpose of using them to clean

- Reply
takenoko: @-Jack: Dip them in ketchup after a shelf time of starving and they'll clean each other off.

Alternatively, make your household mare/footrest clean them off, then wipe anything she missed on her fluff.
- Reply
Anonymous1: The delivery systems must be really fast, and they product must fly off the shelves, in order for them to be alive when used. Then again, you DID say the buyers were rich, so they can afford the extra expense.

I can see another fluffy mill, dedicated to skinning them (then selling the meat separately) for the less affluent.
- Reply
Bacner: Fluffies as food, fluffies as clothing, now fluffies as cleaning rags? For such wretched beasts they certainly have a lot of practical uses!

- Reply
megs: 'babeh hewp' is the name of the product? lololol
- Reply
Anonymous2: If someone said fluffies hate having their shit licked off, fluffy shit would be considered a delicacy.
- Reply
Divine_Moments_of_Truth: Very inefficient.
Yet very satisfying.

- Reply
aroptua: Too bad they have an extremely short shelf life. Aheheh.
- Reply
Anonymous3: @Emil: those foals will arrive DEAD. where are they getting fed?
- Reply
Anonymous4: Is the product supposed to be called "Baby Help?" Just wondering. Also, just a general question of interest: Do fluffies have a hard time getting back up after they have been knocked on their backs (like a turtle)?

Nice peice though.
- Reply
Anonymous5(4): (Anon 4 here): Are the foal individually wrapped?
- Reply
Anonymous6(4): foals*

- Reply
takenoko: @Anonymous: Physically, I don't think it's ever been much of an issue. Mentally? Yes indeed.
- Reply
Anonymous7: ...What is this, exactly?

- Reply
Guzziman: they're no match for a magic eraser
- Reply
Anonymous8: Ah, I love the butchered English in these things. Needs more abuse though.

- Reply
Tartan_Fluffy: What exactly is the actual point in doing this given that normal mops can be reused and anyone who isn't an idiot is not going to use SOMETHING THAT WILL BLEED AND SHIT EVERYWHERE to clean?

- Reply
FanglyFish: It's always nice to see fluffies abused in a way that's productive to society.

- Reply
Oracle: "Dear Fluffycorp.
I purchased your new product "Babe hewp!" under the presumption that it's "fluffy-fine" cleaning ability would be, in some manner, superior to existing, more affordable, durable products.
However, upon opening my first container, I found that, not only were the three foals inside of it deceased, but that their fluff had become matted with a mixture of feces and blood, and was unable to absorb any fluid whatsoever.
My second package (fresher, i presume) contained three severely dehydrated foals, whose fluff was likewise matted with urine and feces, and inappropriate for cleaning.
Enclosed is my receipt and proof of purchase. I am demanding a full refund.

~letter recovered from abuse world.
- Reply
Anonymous9: Yes.Yes. More.
- Reply
Anonymous10: i don't see this working as a commercial product, but some factories/businesses might use em like mops. maybe a fluffy shelter using the "bad fluffies" for this to keep the rest in line would work out

- Reply
Tartan_Fluffy: @FanglyFish: Except it's actually counter-productive, significantly less effective than the alternatives, the discarded products will act as a vector for disease and have predatory/scavenger animals knock over your trash to recover used mopheads and therefore attracting, you guessed it, more fucking fluffies.

In short, they actually cause a net gain of about 563.5% extra mess on average according to SCIENCE.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: By the time these things are shipped, the fluffies inside are already dead and the cleaning process is not as fun anymore. :/

- Reply
Tartan_Fluffy: They really are the second stupidest product involving Fluffies that anyone has ever thought was a good idea.

After Fluffies themselves, of course
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Tartan_Fluffy: No, fluffies are actually a clever idea if those flaws are fixed. Using the 1.0 models as anything other than as pets however, that's stupid.
- Reply
PhantomFluffy: The police would care in real life, so would the health board, and the humane society.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @PhantomFluffy: ESPECIALLY since those things are crying in the shipping. Arrest those bastards.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Anonymous: Neat idea. Bad fluffies who pissed on the floor will be used as a mop to clean the piss.
- Reply
Bacner: @PhantomFluffy: True, and here look at the police's notice in the topmost panel.

- Reply
Painkiller: their not getting my money....

- Reply
deathproofpony: I wish Billy Mays was still alive... he could pitch the shit out of this wonderful product.

- Reply
niceguy: Dramatic Narrator: This was only the beginning. Despite the publicity it's safe to say that Hasbio never truly expected the Fluffy Pony to change the world.

But it did. When the working classes of the world saw the money, time and effort that the wealthy would spend on making a small weak animal suffer and at the same time making efforts to use them to continue taking money from the poor they took notice.

- Reply
Druid42: This product is inefficient and impractical. If you want to use fluffy to clean, just skin the fluffy and convert the fluff into a reusable rag.
- Reply
LordPomposity: @Painkiller: They're not getting mine, either. Why buy a fluffy cleaning kit when you could just grab one off the street?
- Reply
Anonymous11: @Druid42: Then eat the rest of the foal.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Druid42: I think the reason why live fluffies are used instead of just their fluff it's because some folks wanted to hear them scream.
- Reply
Anonymous12: I'll take 10
- Reply
Anonymous13: what is wrong with fluffies? You're traped retard! Seriously, enf, enf, enf?
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Anonymous: Sorry, stallion can't help it and got horny.
- Reply
Anonymous14: @Pest_Control: You regularly buy things past their expiration date?
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Pest_Control: Bury them like all dead fluffies.
- Reply
Thunder_Sword: You know, as much as I like the pain and suffering being done here, I think my favorite part of this comic is the sign from the police department at the front of the building.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Thunder_Sword: Yeah, the police came to this factory so often that they decided not to care anymore.
- Reply
Anonymous15: Hahaha, time to be an ASSHOLE! They'll live in the boxes! They can't die unless they're used! Mwahahaha!

- Reply
Death: @Anonymous: Dude, what the fuck do you think you're doing? That's my job.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Anonymous: Yup. And Aichi was right about them having a hard time getting back up after they have been knocked on their backs, but it was mainly due to fluff?
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Oracle: Lessorn learned: never ship fluffies in any package, because they'll die once they arrived.

- Reply
Fortune: Wait, I have the answer for why these can survive!
They're Goats "Fart sunshine and piss rainbows" Fluffies that run on electricity! They don't need to eat or shit, just charge them up fully before packaging and charge when taken out and you're good to go!
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Fortune: Makes more sense, now these fluffies are good for stuff like this rather than being disposed of.

- Reply
Fluffycock: I approve of these products.
- Reply
Anonymous16: @UR: we get it your fucked up in the head get help or ill make you swallow your teeth

- Reply
Tartan_Fluffy: @Anonymous: >Says person is not right in the head
>Threatens violence.

Welcome to Fluffybooru, folks.

- Reply
Lord_Whillmar: 1) By fluffy as a cleaning tool
2) In process of cleaning fluffy shits himself
3) Throw him in trash compactor
4) Buy another fluffy
...
May be a little long cleaning procedure, but think about the fun.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Lord_Whillmar: Read Fortune's explanation and see why they don't shit themselves.

- Reply
Tartan_Fluffy: @Lord_Whillmar: Think about the money and time you waste, you could easily use a regular mop and just go out with a baseball bat to attack the feral herds.

- Reply
takenoko: It depends on how much bodily waste fluff can absorb vs how much waste the product can release at the time of packaging.

If the fluffy has been presqueezed and forced to build up large fat reserves, it won't produce that much wasst and only part of it will be dedicated to cleaning up their own mess. The rest of the fluff is still clean and usable, so it's a net gain.

Since fluff is relatively easy to clean (even worthless ferals can keep themselves somewhat clean), the reusability means that the initial loss of cleaning ability is only temporary if you're planning on reusing the foals for multiple jobs in a day. For dollar store shoppers, this would be a big draw. Then again, the price point is low enough to just throw them away after a single specialized use. Especially for those hard-to-reach places on your car frame that you wish your brush could just crawl into all by itself.
- Reply
Anonymous17(7): To sumarize from previous comments, this would never work in the real world beacsuse:

1: Normal people and fluffy owners would find this disgusting (Would you use a puppy to clean your kitchen counter?). Things would get worse if they found out about the testing and "manufactureing" processes. The goverment would probably shut this place down less than a week after it opened in a more realistic setting (The cops in this story are either apathetic or courupt).

2: The foals would either die from starvation, dehydration, disesese or rough handeling during shiping, or would be completely covered in crap and piss and therefore be unfit for cleaning. Either way, a waste of money.

Fluff Corp is probably going to go under in the next week or two.

- Reply
Tartan_Fluffy: @Anonymous: The abusefags cannot actually tie what they think should happen to the rational reality of our world. Thus, they have rejected it and substituted it with their own.

It still makes no fucking sense even then, but hey. At least they're remaining consistent within their own rules of their own world. Usually. Apart from the whole "shit is so fragile" yet they routinely survive this sort of thing, being boiled alive, bricks, fire, maiming, bisection, failed rolls for anal circumference, encounters with gazebos, etc...
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Tartan_Fluffy: Agreed with Anon 17. Then again, I've always thought the phrase "shit is so fragile which is broken by all" is only reserved for defect foals, but now it was used to describe any fluffy, even the very fat adults.
- Reply
DoctorWhooves:
- Reply
MisterRobot: I would totally spend money for such an establishment.

- Reply
Ginger_Fig: @Tartan_Fluffy: You are so full of shit I can smell it from here.
I have yet to see one hugboxer produce a single valid reference or precedent to support their dreamy headcanon. Your "universes" are assembled on the sole basis of "d'awww, these shit vermin are so cute...I want them to be happy & playful forever." That's fine, believe what you wish but don't try to claim that your foolish HC is any more or less realistic than using foals to clean windows.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Ginger_Fig: I dunno, it seems that the hive mind headcanon seems to be associated with the abusers: hence we see a lot of constant shitting, fragility and runt rejection. Now if only the hugboxers can make their own HC.
- Reply
Anonymous18: @Ginger_Fig: So in your little abuse bubble world using foals to clean windows is realistic or just as realistic as fluffies having rights and being treated like animals? You really are on fucked up person. I wonder what your parents did to you.

- Reply
Ginger_Fig: @GrazingGoat: I can agree that the shit & fragility (I'd also add exaggerated vulnerability to drowning) are taken to ridiculous extremes, but the runt rejection is 100% realistic to nature. If an animal knows it's a waste of time to care for a baby that isn't going to survive that baby gets cast aside. Sympathy for offspring that aren't going to survive is a purely human invention.

>Now if only the hugboxers can make their own HC.
And here's a big part of what I was getting at. Hugbox HC seems to change from story to story, usually as some sort of ret-con reaction to an abuse story that made you mad. I dare say the lack of consistency stems from the fact that hugbox bases nothing on observable real-world precedent.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Anonymous: I believe fluffies having rights and being treated like animals should be hivemind canon. Whatever UR did here is strictly abuse canon, just like mares rejecting runts, fluffy meat, constant pooping and being so fragile which is broken by all.
- Reply
Anonymous19(18): @Ginger_Fig: I say GB, Staccato, DPP and severa others would disagree. You know, decent/good writers.
- Reply
Anonymous20(18): @GrazingGoat: Mares rejecting runts is not just abuse canon.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Ginger_Fig: Yeah, I think folks took the concept "this shit is so fragile which is broken by all" which was originally used to describe a defect foal and then they implement to healthy foals and even adults. And yeah, the shit thing may be based on canons where fluffies are designed to eat fluffy chow which helps reduce their fecal output, and by the time the chow is no more, the shitting can't stop. And folks took that to a whole new level by inventing sorry and scared poopies. That's just my theory, since I'm still new here.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Anonymous: Ah, got that message from GF. Mares rejecting runts is GENERAL canon. But injuring, shitting on and killing them? I'm sure that is not hivemind canon...

- Reply
Ginger_Fig: @Anonymous: Awwww, have we reached the limit of our simpleton debating talents. When you have no salient argument try for a personal attack. He must have something wrong with him because he disagrees with me.

Obviously UR's drawing is meant to be comedic...and it is funny.
Fluffies being treated as animals and having rights isn't funny, it's just stupid. Fluffy ponies are a problem that needs to be eliminated, not a real species worthy of protection.
- Reply
Anonymous21(18): @GrazingGoat: My opinion differs per story really.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Anonymous: GB = You mean Giant Neckbeard? (GNB)

His canon is quite valid, in my opinion.
- Reply
Anonymous22(18): @Ginger_Fig: Nah, I just think there are a fe screws loose in your head. Just my personal headcanon. But hey, if think they deserve no right then more power to you.
- Reply
Anonymous23(18): @GrazingGoat: Yeah. I think GB is the best story writer this site has to offer.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Ginger_Fig: Gotta agree UR's stuff is acceptable because it was done for laughs (or in his words, fuck them that's why). But fluffies being treated as animals and having rights may vary depending on the author. Some wanted to eliminate them (like you), some want them to remain as pets and wild animals (like me).
- Reply
Anonymous24(18): @Ginger_Fig: To be honest I don't blame anon 18.

- Reply
Ginger_Fig: Not sure how much it adds to the conversation, but on the topic of fluffy rights; there is legal precedent that bio-engineered animals do not have rights (at least in the US).
By a vote of 5-4, the US Supreme Court ruled that the "relevant distinction is not between living and inanimate things, but whether living products could be seen as 'human-made inventions.'"
Man made animals could be patented and existed outside normal animal rights statutes.

The first bio-engineered animal to be patented was called the OncoMouse, created by DuPont for cancer research in 1988. There are now over 660 patented bio-engineered animals.
- Reply
Anonymous25(18): @Ginger_Fig: Only in silly america!
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Ginger_Fig: Seems legit. Otherwise, if they have no rights, they would be stuck in their pet stores where they belong to be treated like toys. But PETA made the mistake by releasing an over-breeding group of them...
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @GrazingGoat: And thus the human population is divided. Some wanted to get rid of them and treat them like shit, others would condemn the extermination and wanted them to be treated like actual animals. Whether the government wanted to give them rights or not, it's highly up to who's writing the story. My 2 cents.
- Reply
Anonymous26(18): @GrazingGoat: DAMN YOU PETA!
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Anonymous: If PETA had released the OK fluffies (ones who may be spayed/neutered), it may be a whole different story altogether. (Sorry, got influenced by Weggies)

- Reply
Ginger_Fig: @GrazingGoat: As I've said before...even if the PeTA story is true it's a moot point. If PeTA hadn't released fluffy ponies they'd still have gotten loose and formed breeding populations. Whether you accept it or not PeTA's part in the story is completely irrelevant.

Disasterous overpopulation is the lynchpin of my HC. When doing my research I based my numbers on rats. One single pregnant black rat can potentially lead to 2000 rats in one year. Now, fluffy ponies have smaller litters than rats and higher mortality so I discounted the rat numbers by 90%. At only 2 foals per litter that's still 200 fluffies descended from one mare in only 12 months. I don't think you need a special "over-breeding group" to produce crisis-level population.
- Reply
GrazingGoat: @Ginger_Fig: True, though my theory that weggies' idea may be valid still stands.
- Reply
Anonymous27(18): @Ginger_Fig: And it will be glorious.

- Reply
Guzziman: @Ginger_Fig: the fact that fluffies talk would make many change their minds and would drive many insane, alot of things would happen and with that activism for their "rights"
- Reply
Anonymous28: @Guzziman: Maybe THEY can be the ones who would voice out their "rights". Like the humans would care anyway...

- Reply
Guzziman: ^ you obviously haven't seen a bunch of liberal pussies haven't you
- Reply
Anonymous29: just wondering....what are they selling them for? is it as a cleaning or abuse product? I wanna know this because if I buy a cleaning product, it probably will have been made for cleaning, and won't taste too good.
- Reply
Anonymous30(1): @Anonymous: Yes.

- Reply
metalking: i will find a leather face fluffy pony let hope it won't eat me
- Reply
Anonymous31: @Pest_Control: Stick them in the blender and watch the show. Obviously.

- Reply
MisterEightySix: Okay, neutral as I try to be, if you cannot see why the things depicted in this picture are unethical, please have a doctor check your brain. There's this little thing called "empathy" that you may be missing.
- Reply
Anonymous32: Why do I come to Fluffybooru, to remind myself while the real world can be really fucking bad, at least in some ways, it could be alot worse.

- Reply
Simpfan: If disinfectant is used, that would be the prettiest any of those fluffies has EVER smelled!
- Reply
Anonymous33: If you hate fluffies, you can stop wathing them. Then you will have peace.
- Reply
Anonymous34: ( the workers begin a new round of tests, just as the copbots break into the building
Copbot1524: you are all under arrest. Prepare for your beating

( everybody got a free broken jaw
- Reply
Anonymous35: It is inhumane
- Reply
Anonymous36: LOL at the fluffy that actually ENJOYS what's happening to him/her.
- Reply
Diogenes_Shandor_DeSade:
- Reply
Diogenes_Shandor_DeSade: @Ginger_Fig: It's realistic to nature but not realistic to something designed to be cute
- Reply
Anonymous37: I'll kill you and your mother
Thread locked for the current user.